@ emilienko said in the last entry his blog that Health 2.0 is not a clearly defined concept and therefore its meaning varies depending on who uses it. He claims that while some believe is a change in the doctor-patient relationship, others think it's an open door to disclosure bidirectional health and disease and others that it is a good way to facilitate communication between the professionals themselves.
Although practice this last of the "meanings" Health 2.0 is for me something different. If for 2.0 internet revolution has meant the creation of content by users, something previously limited to professionals and computer enthusiasts, the Health 2.0 should be another revolution, very nearly as much as the advent of antibiotics.
In this regard I believe in a Health 2.0 bring significant new features to the way we diagnose and treat our patients. As in the revolution of the web does not necessarily mean the modulation of the regulatory mechanisms of the body externally, something we have already achieved with the current pharmacopoeia, but must also involve access to content creation and editing to achieve change in the way working the body, optimizing their performance and encouraging the addition of new tools and new routes from existing ones. The mechanisms for this are in every one of us. It only remains to identify them and use them, and although it does not seem an easy task, sure that somehow many of you are already on it.
0 comments:
Post a Comment