Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Milena Velva Con Un Negro

ACTIVITY 3: Einstein, Bohr, de Broglie, Heisenberg and others.

Although this part of our reader is not part of the contents of 4 of ESO, in our desire to go beyond learning the content in isolation, we believe that reading you enter into an exciting Physics section: the world of the very small. Today
quantum physics with gravitation are two areas of physics with more questions unanswered and where a significant proportion of scientists is proud of his intelligence to figure out what in ancient times sought to be Human: what is the nature of matter?
The content of chapter revolves around a fascinating experiment that is still very difficult to explain to people who have not studied physics: "The double-slit experiment" and environment in this chapter, we have prepared a questionnaire which appears below. It is short-answer questions and most of them can be answered simply by reading the chapter. However, there are some questions we have placed last in the questionnaire that you will require a bit more work, intellectual effort, tenacity and research. Undoubtedly qualities, among others, that scientists should have to make progress as you got people as amazing as those in Title: Einstein, Bohr, de Broglie, Heisenberg ... and whose names have passed into history for its contribution to human knowledge and, though often not explained, well-being and comfort of many of us.
Without their research things like TV, GPS, mobile phones, radiation, scans and many more simply not be possible.

Now that you have read Chapter 10 of our reader you are ready to respond to the questionnaire but before you view the following video which explains what the double slit experiment:



The task must be completed as late on Sunday 23 January.

not forget to send the questionnaire below and continue reading at the end:

< p >

The issues raised will then be responded to via a blog entry. This is a volunteer and can be done alone, in pairs or with the participation of all members of the blog. Avoid
copy / paste, it is clear that we are not inventing anything but make an effort of synthesis and overall aims that everyone can understand.

"I do not really understand something unless you are able to explain to your grandmother." Albert Einstein


1. Find out about the parameters and methods used to date the age of the universe and make a brief summary of the information you find. Do not forget to mention related images and fonts.
Documéntate:
http://astronomia.net/cosmologia/
http://www.astrored.org/astrored/buscador/ (a form of things related to astronomy)
http://es .wikipedia.org / wiki / Big_bang (although wikipedia is well documented)

2. Find the definition of wave physics and the parameters that define it.

3. What Einstein meant by the phrase: "God does not play dice"?

4. Find information on the concepts causality and determinism. Make an analysis of why these concepts are affected by the probabilistic interpretation of the wave function and to what extent this can be a problem.

5. Dare to make an interpretation of what the author means when he writes: "How do we know that the moon is there when we are not looking? (The top 239)

6. Back to watch video from the double-slit experiment:



Could you make a little video overview of mention: the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, Schrödinger equation, duality wave-particle and the collapse of the wave function?

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Much Do Sock Rims Cost

Manifesto in Defense of Fundamental Rights in Internet


Given the inclusion in the Draft Law on Sustainable economy of legislative changes affecting the free exercise of freedom of expression, information and the right of access to culture through the Internet, journalists, bloggers, users, professionals and Internet developers express our firm opposition to the project, and declare that ...

1 .- The copyright can not be placed above citizens' fundamental rights, including the right to privacy, security, presumption of innocence, to effective judicial protection and freedom of expression.

2 .- The suspension of fundamental rights is and must remain the exclusive competence of the judiciary. Not a close without trial. This blueprint, contrary to the provisions of Article 20.5 of the Constitution, put in the hands of a non-judicial body under the Ministry of Culture, the power to prevent English citizens access to any website.

3 .- The new legislation will create legal uncertainty around the English technology sector, hurting one of the few areas of development and future of our economy, hindering the creation of enterprises by introducing barriers to competition and slowing its international expansion.

4 .- The new proposed legislation threatens to hinder new creators and cultural creation. With The Internet and new technologies have democratized the creation and release of contents of any kind, no longer come predominantly from the traditional cultural industries, but from many different sources.

5 .- The authors, like all workers are entitled to live out of their creative ideas, business models and activities associated with their creations. Trying to hold legislative changes to an outdated industry that can adapt to this new environment is neither fair nor realistic. If your business model is based on the control of the copies of the works and the Internet is not possible without violating fundamental rights, should find another model.

6 .- We believe that cultural industries need to survive modern alternatives, effective, credible and affordable to suit new social practices, rather than limitations so disproportionate as to be ineffective in that they are pursuing.

7 .- Internet should function freely and without interference from groups that seek to perpetuate outdated business models and impossible for human knowledge remains free.

8 .- We ask the Government to guarantee the neutrality law of the network in Spain, to any pressure that may occur as a framework for developing a sustainable economy for the future.

9 .- We propose a real reform of intellectual property rights aimed at an end: return to the society of knowledge, promote the public domain and limit abuses of management entities.

10 .- In a democracy, laws and amendments should be adopted after due debate and consultation with all parties involved. It is unacceptable that legislative changes are made that affect rights fundamental organic no law that deals with other matters.
This manifesto, drawn up jointly by several authors, is all and none. If you want to join it, spread it over the Internet.

http://www.microsiervos.com/archivo/internet/en-defensa-de-los-derechos-fundamentales-en-internet.html

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Inteview Question For An Equity Dealer Job

ACTIVITY 2: RUTHERFORD, the atomic nucleus


Ernest Rutherford is one of the great figures of science. Perhaps more important than his own discoveries was the great legacy of scientists trained in that glorious era of physics that goes from the last quarter nineteenth century to the first quarter of the twentieth century. Being able to be in the elite of scientific knowledge, at par, to transmit this knowledge to wider society, is really commendable. And in that regard Rutherford was also an ace. Surely this attitude popularizer of science has much to do, as you may have read in the chapter, with its origins in a very distant (physically and socially) colony (remember he was born in the nineteenth century). Rutherford was to bring science to the average citizen of his time taking his mysticism in which he wraps his experimental and mathematical procedure. You, as students taking Physics and Chemistry You are required to soak in this mysticism , you are initiated into the art of knowing the experimental methods and mathematical sciences that give these wonderful answers to new questions based on cause.

Perhaps you've ever had the feeling of living in a "magical society" : I give a button and turn on the TV, keep instant contact with the rest of the world regardless of distance, I have all the music a single click, but I can not understand how these devices. It's like a "technological sect" direct my life. Well, if you keep studying these wonderful science one day come to be able to be part of that "sect" , and perhaps, hopefully, be amongst those who think like Rutherford (not to belittle the waiter): "If you explain to a waiter you're doing and do not understand, how poor is not the waiter, but what you're doing " .

This activity, performed by members of the blog (remember all the comments about group work), will appear in your blog deadline on Monday November 15 .

1 - As you have read JJ Thomson was a professor of Rutherford, which in turn was Professor Hans Geiger. How do you rate fact that scientific research training to students? Find out what happens in the Faculties of Science English.

2 - In the words of Rutherford, "all science, or is physics or stamp collecting is" . In 1908, he was awarded the Nobel Prize of Chemistry. His reaction was really curious "I have changed many times in my life, but never so sharp as in the physical metamorphosis of chemical" . What are the differences between physics and chemistry? Gives an interpretation to both sentences of the scientist, why do you think he received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry and not for physics?

3-Find out about the biography of Nikola Tesla . What were your major contributions to physics? What scientific disputes remained with Edison and Marconi ? We recommend a movie: The Prestige. The plot of this movie describes very well the mixture of magic and science that prevailed in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Optional Work up note: Make a timeline with key scientific facts of this period.


4 - Throughout the chapter descriptions happen about the discovery of various physical phenomena (which can and should add to the timeline) that will be crucial in the development of twentieth century society and still very relevant today. Respond briefly (only in the book would be enough for this point, except the links indicated) to the following series of questions (referring to the scientists involved):
4a) What is the difference fluorescence of phosphorescence?
4b) What are X-rays? How do you find?
4c) What is Radioactivity? How was it discovered?
4d) Why were important contributions Curies Rutherford and the work of Becquerel?
4e) What are alpha, beta and gamma? Sort them energetically.
4f) What is the law of atomic decay? Why is used as a method of geological dating? Working optional: Research on carbon-14
4g) What is a Geiger counter ?

5 - Explain how you conducted the experiment of Rutherford. If you want, you can do with a little video, to simulate the experiment. Why not work with Mica, yes with gold leaf and was greatly improved with platinum bread? Says the phrase "It como si se disparara un obús naval de buen calibre sobre una hoja de papel y rebotara" .







6- Describe el modelo de Rutherford y sus limitaciones. ¿Por qué el equipo de Rutherford se puede considerar el padre de la interacción nuclear (piensa en qué lo ocurriría a los protones si no existiera dicha interacción)? ¿Qué son las 4 interacciones fundamentales de la naturaleza?





7- Crea tu propio "escudo científico" (buscando tu propio lema científico) as he did when he was named Baron Rutherford.

Monday, November 1, 2010

Reconsideration Letter For University

My Health 2.0

@ emilienko said in the last entry his blog that Health 2.0 is not a clearly defined concept and therefore its meaning varies depending on who uses it. He claims that while some believe is a change in the doctor-patient relationship, others think it's an open door to disclosure bidirectional health and disease and others that it is a good way to facilitate communication between the professionals themselves.

Although practice this last of the "meanings" Health 2.0 is for me something different. If for 2.0 internet revolution has meant the creation of content by users, something previously limited to professionals and computer enthusiasts, the Health 2.0 should be another revolution, very nearly as much as the advent of antibiotics.

In this regard I believe in a Health 2.0 bring significant new features to the way we diagnose and treat our patients. As in the revolution of the web does not necessarily mean the modulation of the regulatory mechanisms of the body externally, something we have already achieved with the current pharmacopoeia, but must also involve access to content creation and editing to achieve change in the way working the body, optimizing their performance and encouraging the addition of new tools and new routes from existing ones. The mechanisms for this are in every one of us. It only remains to identify them and use them, and although it does not seem an easy task, sure that somehow many of you are already on it.